|
|
Post by Kay on Aug 6, 2008 13:10:08 GMT -5
As we discussed in the first Potter Watch episode, we have some questions. And maybe you guys have theories... 1) Why did McGonagall wait for Dumbledore all day long? 2) Why wasn't she part of the OotP in the first war? 3) Why weren't the Weasleys as well on the original OotP group photo? Discuss!  |
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Aug 6, 2008 18:52:23 GMT -5
I would imagine that the Weasleys would be newly wed with at least one infant and a little scared of endangering their baby. Just a thought. And as I recall McGonagall wasn't as close to Dumbledore back during the first war and wouldn't have been let into the OotP. Just a couple of thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kay on Aug 7, 2008 1:08:58 GMT -5
So you wanna say the Potters were braver than the Weasleys?
But IF she weren't that close, why did she wait for him a whole day? I always thought she had a thing for Dumbledore.....
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan on Aug 7, 2008 1:53:31 GMT -5
from memory, i think the weasleys were in the ootp picture in the ootp movie?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kay on Aug 7, 2008 2:12:52 GMT -5
I'm sure they're not on the pic in the book - not too sure about the movie, will watch it on my iPod rly fast and then post here.
Maybe the movie is a bit off-canon here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kay on Aug 7, 2008 2:30:16 GMT -5
I checked the movie - no sign of the Weasleys there.
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan on Aug 7, 2008 3:04:23 GMT -5
ohk my bad.........i always thought they were part of the original OotP because of the fact that molly's brothers (gideon and fabian??) were killed by voldemort.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kay on Aug 7, 2008 3:29:40 GMT -5
Maybe they were only collateral damage, no idea.
And YEAH I have all the HP movies and audio books (of course by Jim Dale) always with me on my iPod. I'm THAT much a freak LOL...
|
|
|
|
Post by tristan on Aug 8, 2008 23:21:42 GMT -5
i should do that but my iPod has no video..
|
|
